Posted by Holger Schauer in
Linux
Monday, November 2. 2009
November is here and Ubuntu 9.10 Karmic Koala is there, too. As one of its promises is faster start-up time, I used the weekend to update my laptop (a Dell 610) which was still running Hardy (8.04). The upgrade path (hardy->intrepid->jaunty->karmic) took quite some time and I'm not entirely sure it was worth it:
- Bootup time doesn't seem to have improved, quite to the contrary. I'm mounting ntfs volumes on startup and it seems that
the new parallel bootup procedure seems to run into trouble with that.
- I lost support for fglrx, the proprietary driver for the ATI graphics. It's possible to reinstall the package, but modprobing the module gives a "failed to allocate memory" error. Hence, no "graphics effects" (aka) compiz for me.
- Gnome-Shell isn't installed by default for me.
- The xemacs21-mule package postinstall script fails. This has the not exactly nice side effect that the upgrade procedure decided to quit after installing new packages, which means that it didn't clean up the cruft left behind from the old installation and also didn't boot into the new kernel.
- The update to grub2 didn't honour my old selection for which OS to boot by default (the laptop is mostly used by family members who prefer alternative systems).
And as always on Ubuntu update, a lot of crap that I got rid off previously, gets reinstalled. Like fspot, tomboy and wvdial, to name but a few. I can't help being reminded of adware.
Update:Turns out that newer fglrx modules don't support my ATI Radeon Mobility 1400 any longer (since jaunty, that is). To get GLX working, I had to un-install everything related to fglrx and re-install mesa. What I learned again the hard way during me fiddling with my old xorg.conf is that gdm is a real PITA if you have no working X configuration. What really annoyed me, though, was that status messages from dosfsck hosed the recovery (boot) mode in that the keyboard became unusable. Worse, my hard configured wlan setup at boot time is currently not working anymore, I can connect to my WiFi only through network manager. But without X I couldn't startup network manager, of course, so I also could't do a remote login. And the Wifi connection is really flakey whereas it had been stable ever since with the older hardy installation. Probably a driver issue. Update 2: Various forum entries suggested using backported modules for wifi, including a newer version of the iwl3945 driver. However, this didn't solve my problem. Another entry suggested switching to wicd instead of NetworkManager. And yes, indeed, my wifi problems are gone now.
ObTitle: Gorillaz, "Demon Days"
Posted by Holger Schauer in
Linux
Friday, July 31. 2009
So I finally bought a new desktop computer in order to replace my old and loud one. The new one should fulfill two more or less conflicting requirements: it should be fast and quiet. "Fast" mainly refers to cpu and disk speed, for the gpu I only had the minimal requirement that it would be possible to see videos (non-HD) and show some basic 3d effects. I left most of the details to a local dealer, but I verified that the components would work with Linux, which actually means I only needed to ensure that the board, an Asus P5Q-VM, which is based on the intel G45 chipset, would work. A little digging showed that there might be some problems with X11 if the distribution didn't provide new enough drivers but I found enough success reports to be optimistic.
Well, I finally got the new workstation. It's an impressive black box with a Silentmaxx ST-11 tower which is really very silent -- it's so quiet that they provide large blue leds on the box to that you have a reminder that the system is on -- this was one of the details I wasn't aware of when ordering the system. I started installing Debian Lenny on the box, as I always followed the rule that buying a new computer is a good point in time to install from scratch and get rid of old software cruft. So I did nothing to carry over my old installation which I had regularly updated at least since Sarge. That was actually a quite pleasant way for me as it was the first time I've got to see the "new" graphical installer. There were some minor obstacles, though. First, this time I wanted to have both an LVM setup and encryption running. I was pleasantly suprised to see the installer providing an option for such a setup, but quite less suprised to see it fail with a segmentation fault during wiping the (500GB sata) disk. Fortunately, the manual partitioning option provided enough easy guidelines to quickly rebuild the setup of the automated partitioning scheme while allowing to leave out the unneeded step to clean the disk, so this was not a big issue. Another point that I think is interesting is that hibernation worked out of the box even with the LVM/crypto setup -- I had thought that hibernate or better said, suspend to disk, would requre the swap to be unencrypted but apparently I was wrong. Very nice.
I went on to install a very minimal system without any desktop setup. I went away from Gnome back to WindowMaker some time ago, but I had seen the LXDE as an install option which is a much smaller "desktop environment" with OpenBox2 as the central window manager. Now, compare the list of packages for Gnome with the list of list of packages for lxde -- that's quite a difference. But soon enough I realized how difficult it has become to avoid the larger environments. There are quite a lot of applications which I am used to using right now (having installed Gnome on my older desktop as well as running Ubuntu with Gnome on several other installations) which depend on Gnome. Evolution, for instance, which I privately mainly use as a glorified calender, depends on Gnome just as Rhythmbox does. This may hardly come as a suprise, but I've simpy not thought about it in advance. So I'm now looking for replacements for some applications.
Of course, in order to run any desktop environment you have to have a running X11 installation. This failed at first: I had connected my 19"-TFT (an old Benq one) via VGA to the on-board graphic chipset from the G45, which resulted in the monitor proclaiming to get out-of sync timings. After replacing the VGA connection with a DVI one, the vesa driver provided a working X11 setup. However, I soon discovered that I would not want to stick with the vesa setup, as for instance there is no xvideo extension. Unfortunately, the xserver-xorg-video-intel package in Lenny is version 2.3.2, which is too old to support the G45, so even though I specified the intel driver in the device section of /etc/X11/xorg.conf, I didn't get a usable screen. However, packages for Xorg in version 2.8 had entered unstable some time ago -- as I had quickly installed kernel 2.6.30 from backports.org and the packages doesn't have to broad version requirements on other packages, this seemed like a viable option. So I know have an up and running intel driver for X11, but it remains to be seen how stable it really is over time. And, of course, I've got to keep an eye on security updates.
ObTitle: Björk, "Post", (more info)
Posted by Holger Schauer in
Linux
Friday, May 30. 2008
I've tried Compiz with Metacity again and switch it off after a day -- again. I'm not willing to do without working software suspend just for some graphical whizz. I've been using Metacity for, I think nearly two years now, on my work computers and have somehow accomodated to it's various glitches (for instance the unusable keyboard settings). On my trusty home workstation, however, I've stuck with WindowMaker, which I think I've been using roughly since 1997 (I can't remember the version number, but it was fairly low). Unfortunately, development seems to have stopped -- since quite some time there is no sign of activity on the webpage and the mailing list archive is dead.
Yesterday, out of a current frustration about Metacity, I installed a naked current version of WindowMaker on one of my machines, under Ubuntu 8.04 (don't try to make WindowMaker work under Gnome: While WindowMaker does "work" under Gnome, it is really crippled. For instance, the keyboard setting know nothing about WindowMaker but still override your keyboard settings via, say, WPrefs.). Nearly everything worked as expected, but there were two glitches: the menu didn't reflect the installed software. Having customized the thing under my Debian system, I knew that this was supposed to work with the update-menu script, but that was missing. Some web-searching revealed that for some reason or other Ubuntu no longer installs the menu(-xdg) package. The other glitch was a very old complaint: That WindowMaker doesn't ship with a virtual desktop switcher or pager. You don't need to tell me about the different philosophy of WindowMaker, I know all about it. However, I've been using Fvwm and OpenLook (OLVWM) too long.
I could use gnome-panel (which I've done before in the past), but of course that brings me those two panels that make sense for Metacity and besides it also means that I would still depend on gnome. I've did quite a bit of looking around to find out what all the cool Fluxbox, Openbox etc. users are using and finally found fbpanel (the trick was to search for "taskbar" instead of "pager"). So, finally thanks to netwm support (which I think is in WindowMaker since 0.90), the one missing bit from WindowMaker is finally there without Gnome. Oh my, I'm finding this out really late.
Posted by Holger Schauer in
Linux, Music
Monday, December 4. 2006
After about sechs years of XMMS usage, I think I'm finally done with it. Playlist handling is a major pain. And I usually just shuffle my way through my collection. But don't even try to find a song in that long, long way down south ... sorry, down the playlist.
I've tried Rhythmbox, but as it is to closely bound to Gnome (and gstreamer, in particular) it doesn't work for me (I'm using WindowMaker without Gnome on my workstation at home). And no, I don't have any KDE libraries installed and yes, I like it that way -- although I've heard quite a lot good things about amarok.
Dear Lazyweb, please what kind of audio player might fit my needs? I just need a little more functionality than XMMS. Selection by album, artist and/or genre would be nice.
Posted by Holger Schauer in
Linux
Wednesday, April 12. 2006
Yesterday, I ranted about Cincoms inability to fix an apparent incompatibility of VisualWorks with Xorg on Ubuntu. Today, it looks like it's not Cincom fault, but a user-overfriendlyness by Gnome. I can use VisualWorks on Xorg with e.g. WindowMaker without any problem. Gnome (2.8, at least, as shipped with Ubuntu) generates an empty fonts.dir file in ~/.gnome2/share/fonts which seems like a very pointless idea. It also breaks other applications besides VisualWorks. I will have to wait for Dapper to arrive to see whether Gnome 2.10 fixes the issue.
The other possibilty, of course, would be to drop Gnome (and that Metacity) again. Seems we won't become friends.
Posted by Holger Schauer in
Linux
Tuesday, April 4. 2006
For the first time in twelve years of Linux experience, I encountered a problem with a command line solution that doesn't show up with a GUIzed version of the same procedure. I tried mounting a samba share from on of our file-servers via smbmount, which works flawlessly with my old Debian Woody install. Using the exact same settings on Ubuntu mounts the share, however I can't look into it at all. I.e., I can't even call stat on the mount.
Using Nautilus/Gnome, however, I can succesfully connect to the server and even open a file browser on it. However, how gnome-vfs, which obviously handles the mount, does it's magic is beyond me. I can't even see a mount of the share via /proc/mounts or with lsof. Seems like gnome-vfs uses a socket connection directly, perhaps thereby not running into the problem I have with smbmount?
Update: cifs instead of smbfs was the reason.
|